We were talking about Socrates' "An unexamined life is not worth living". He also made it clear that one should know himself (i..e., Know Thyself). He went on to say that he knew nothing that lies beyond or below this world, and that the only thing he was capable of knowing is human experience.
I knew of a person who spent a lot of time understanding a philosopher. He read all the works of his favorite philosopher and was seen as an expert by his peers and students. He was adept in logic and was very good at detecting an invalid argument. He was particularly critical of religious tenets, and could prove the untenability of religious statements. Yet, he was uncritical of his biases and prejudices.
I had also come across some businessmen who were skillful at making money, who could see business opportunities that others could not imagine. They'd spend so much time making money that they have no time for their wives and children. Some are aware of that and have put aside enough time to be with their loved ones. Yet, they have little or no time for themselves. Vacation was a time to rest their bodies so that they could do work the following day.
These people are very intelligent, and are very good at what they do. But, I cannot help thinking that they may secretly be wishing for a better life. You may be contented with living in a certain way. But it does not necessarily mean that you're happy. Many of us are just contented with getting by, surviving another day. Time to rest would mean for some us more time in bed, watching DVDS, playing pc games. A contented life; or, a tolerable way of living that produces the least resistance.
So, if a life worthy of living is a life examined, what of your life should be examined? But, more importantly, how should you examine your life? What attitudes or values should one imbibe. Intelligence and deep knowlege of your profession does not seem to be the key.
Any thoughts?
No comments:
Post a Comment